The 1956 Suez Crisis in Terms of U.S Involvement Essay

In 1956, the United States, led by President Dwight Eisenhower, became self-enveloped in the Suez Canal Crisis involving Israel, Egypt, France, and Great Britain. The United States involvement in the Suez Canal Crisis not only resulted in an Egyptian and Soviet victory, but it also revealed that the United States was capable of gambling in order to gain alliance with Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser as a gateway into the Middle East. America, left utterly dismayed by its allies who planned an endeavor that neglected the country, became involved in the Suez Crisis to confirm its position as the super power in the Middle East. Great Britain had been present in Egypt since the very beginning of the Suez Canal. The nation recognized the†¦show more content†¦In the 1870s however, Ismail put the valuable canal for sale and the British Prime Minister, Benjamin Disraeli purchased it. Years after Ismail’s leadership, the idea of not gaining much of the Suez profit both ered the Egyptians and many hoped for some change in the ownership. Laurie Milner wrote about the objectives of Egypt’s colonel stating, â€Å"By 1954, Colonel Gamal Abdul Nasser had three goals: to make Egypt Independent by ending British occupation; to build up Egyptian forces for a successful attack on Israel; to improve Egypt’s economy by constructing a high dam at Aswan to irrigate the Nile Valley†(Milner). One of the thinsg that the British were involved in at the time of the creation of Nasser’s goals was the Suez Canal. After the British left the country, Nasser planned to nationalize the canal. By 1955, the USSR began sending supplies to Egypt. â€Å"As the last British troops left Egypt, Nasser was completing the purchase of Soviet made aircraft, tanks and arms†¦,† stated Milner. Meanwhile, Britain, Turkey, Iraq, Iran, and Pakistan signed the Baghdad Pact to strengthen security in the Middle East against Soviet influence, but Egypt, who planned to retrieve supplies from the USSR, did not sign the seven year treaty. As soon as the British left Egypt, the Soviet Union began working its way into the Arab region through Egypt. During October 1956, after the nationalization of the Suez Canal, Guy Mollet, Eden, and David Ben-GurionShow MoreRelatedThe Role Of The Great Power Involvement In The Middle East895 Words   |  4 PagesThe Great Power involvement in the Middle East politics often creates and contributes to more conflicts and wars. The Middle East, a region described by Victor Israelyan as ‘one of sharp confrontation between the two superpowers unavoidably fell victim to such pressures. As forms of involvement, the great powers support each respected ally with weapons, troops and even intelligence report, as demonstrated in 1967 war. History has provided us a lesson about great power involvement in the Middle EastRead MoreEssay on The United States and the Suez Crisis of 19562285 Words   |  10 PagesTo what extent was the goal of U.S. actions surrounding the Suez Crisis of 1956 to preserve neutrality to protect U.S. interests? Background: In the midst of the Cold War and the Arab-Israeli conflict, conflict arose over Gamal Abdel Nasser’s nationalization of the Suez Canal. This was of particular concern due to Nasser’s increased connection with the Soviet Union, through the Czech Arms agreement and the Aswan Dam. Following Nasser’s nationalization of the Suez Canal, Great Britain, France, andRead MoreSoviet Penetration and Growth in Syria During the Late 1950s1406 Words   |  6 Pages which effectively decimated virtually every other competing world power aside from the United States and Russia (which swiftly formed the Soviet Union to foster the spread of global communism). More importantly, the cessation of the so-called Suez Crisis, which largely resulted in Britain and Frances colonial decline in Egypt and throughout the Middle East in general, heralded an end of traditional Western domination in the area. From this pivotal event arose a zeitgeist in which Arab nationalismRead Mor eEisenhowers Containment Through Action by Inaction During the Suez Canal Crisis3848 Words   |  16 PagesTaylor Dukes American Presidency Richard Skinner March 15, 2012 Eisenhower’s Containment Through ‘Action by Inaction’ During the Suez Canal Crisis The 1950’s demanded a certain kind of American President: one tranquil enough to reside over a post-WWII society, and yet bold enough to propel the country through the Cold War. Though a description of â€Å"Ike† Dwight D. Eisenhower as a strong central leader heavily contradicts the construed image of a â€Å"kindly grandfather figure, a bit inarticulate andRead MoreThe Era of Nasser Essay2431 Words   |  10 PagesThe Era of Nasser Gamal Abd al-Nasser was President of Egypt from 1956 until1970. During his Presidency he dealt with two major events, the Suez Crisis in 1956 and the 1967 War. Nasser’s triumph in the Suez Crisis in contrast to his severe loss in 1967 can be explained by evaluating Egypt’s stability before and after each event and the reaction of the public during the times of stability and instability. In order to understand the stability of Egypt during Nasser’s Presidency, it is important toRead MoreThe Eisenhower Doctrine Of The Middle East1587 Words   |  7 Pagescontainment policy to stop the advancement of the USSR for a long time. By financially supporting poor countries, the United States reinforced its position in strategic areas. However, following a diplomatic incident in Egypt, specifically the Suez Canal Crisis, involving Great Britain, France, and Israel, hostility against the West among Arab communities grew significantly. That anti-west opinion could not be rel ieved by any financial backing. Following this spreading hostility, President EisenhowerRead MoreUnited Nations Peacekeeping Development And Crisis2019 Words   |  9 PagesUnited Nations Peacekeeping-Development and Crisis Abstract The objective of the paper is to review the development of United Nations’ peacekeeping forces. After World War II, the United Nations had been given new opportunities to help control and resolve conflicts. As a result, new tasks and new method had to be adopted in order to adapt the fast world changing situation and continue growing conflicts which could endanger the international peace. Therefore, the UN peacekeeping forces play a veryRead MoreHow Peacekeeping Operations Evolved Over Time Essay1258 Words   |  6 Pagesact, although a veto from the U.S., Russia, U.K., France or China will prevent an intervention. â€Å"The U.N. provisions for conflict intervention resemble those of the League but are laid out more explicitly and rely on an increasingly coercive sequence of actions.† (Diehl Balas, 2014) In order to understand the evolution of peace operations, we must better understand some of the real world scenarios that have shaped the way these operations are car ried out. In 1956, Israel and Egypt were on theRead MoreEssay on UN Peacekeeping1077 Words   |  5 Pages(Druckman, et.al 1997). Most observers see how peacekeeping has proven its value in stopping hostilities, maintaining cease-fires, restoring some degree of trust, and involvement of peacekeeping in sustaining peace significantly and substantially (Fisher, 1993; Doyle and Sambanis, 2000; Hartzell, Hoddie, and Rothchild,2001). The U.S. office of General Accounting (1999) also describes the success of the UN peacekeeping for the last fifty years. On the other hand opponents of peacekeeping point theRead MoreThe Aftermath Of World War II1562 Words   |  7 PagesLooking back on U.S. policy in regards to Egypt during the Cold War, with the help of readings from The Middle East and the United States, American Orientalism, and Obama and the Middle East, it is clear to understand the overarching national security rationale behind each U.S. administrations policies, but, there are also some key instances where an altered policy towards Egypt may have changed the course of U.S. relations throughout the Middle East. To begin the analysis of U.S. policy towards